Traffic Camera Locations in Toledo, Ohio
June 28th, 2020 Update: The Supreme Court of Ohio recently released an opinion in the case of Magsig v. The City of Toledo that ruled that Municipal Courts have “exclusive jurisdiction” to handle red light and traffic camera infractions. While this important ruling does not outlaw the use of the cameras, it does make the logistics of administering the program far more burdensome for the City of Toledo. Prior to this decision, the City of Toledo used hired hearing officers to hold “proceedings” in One Government Center. The Ohio Supreme Court effectively outlawed this practice, forcing all citations to go before the Toledo Municipal Court.
Shortly after the decision was released, the City of Toledo announced that the use of red-light and handheld cameras would be suspended until further notice. The City government is working to switch the appeals process to the Municipal Court. You can read more here.
Looking for Toledo Speed Camera Locations? Here’s a map created by the car accident lawyers at Sawan & Sawan. The use of traffic cameras by law enforcement in Ohio is a perennially contentious issue. On one side, city governments say that they are about safety. On the other hand, detractors say that it is nothing but a cash grab – with little impact on public safety. Wherever you fall in this debate, you have the right to know the Toledo Speed camera locations.
Traffic camera monitoring is in progress at or near the following intersections in Toledo, Ohio:
Bancroft and Reynolds
Reynolds and Airport Highway
Airport Highway and Holland Sylvania
Heatherdowns and South Reynolds
Cass and Heatherdowns
South Byrne and Airport Highway
South Avenue and Anthony Wayne Trail
Western and Airport Highway
Dorr and Collingwood
Main and Summit
Main and Front
Secor and Dorr
University Hills and Douglas
Secor and Central
Monroe and Secor
Secor and Laskey
Douglas and Laskey
Jackman and Alexis
Lewis and Alexis
Alexis and Detroit
Talmadge and West Sylvania
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
we're here for you
Our family of lawyers is here to help you with your legal issue. Reach out today to schedule a free consultation.
We have over 30 years of combined legal experience.
Please fill out the form and we will get back to you shortly.
A Brief History of Traffic Camera Law in Ohio
Suppose you go to check your mail like you do every day, and you find a notice for a traffic fine from a month ago. If you’re like a lot of Ohio citizens, you have a strong opinion about the police using traffic cameras to enforce speed and red light laws in this fashion. Starting around the year 2000, Cities around Ohio began using stationary cameras to monitor and fine drivers for violations of various traffic laws. This was met with widespread public outcry. Politicians were quick to line up to say that these programs were instituted to protect driver safety, while detractors said it amounted to a thinly veiled cash grab.
In 2015, on the heels of this public outcry, the State of Ohio passed a law requiring that an officer be physically stationed at each camera, a three year traffic study be conducted prior to the deployment of a camera system at a specific location and that certain “leeway” be provided in the programming of the cameras. In July of 2017, The Ohio Supreme Court said in a 5-2 decision that this 2015 state law that makes it all but impossible for local governments to use traffic cameras is unconstitutional because it conflicts with cities’ home-rule authority – in other words, their authority to govern themselves without interference from the State.
In 2018, the Ohio Legislature passed a law that would withhold Local Government Fund revenue-sharing dollars from all cities, villages, and townships with automated, stationary red-light and speed-enforcement cameras in an amount equal to what they collect in civil fines. The City of Toledo has sued to invalidate this law. The Ohio Supreme Court on June 20th, 2018 unanimously found those lower court rulings infringed upon the lawmaking authority of the General Assembly of Ohio and upheld the Ohio law citing “separation-of-powers doctrine” precluding a court from enjoining the General Assembly from exercising its legislative power.
In Ohio, there is a concept in the law called “home rule.” In general, this provides local governments the ability to govern as they see fit with respect to local police, sanitation and the like. The Ohio Constitution, enacted in 1912 states that “municipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws.” The Constitution further states that “any municipality may frame and adopt or amend a charter for its government and may, subject to the provisions of section 3 of this article, exercise thereunder all powers of local self-government.”
In 2015, after public uproar over the use of these cameras, the Ohio legislature tried to deal a death blow to the practice by passing a bill requiring that a law officer by present at the cameras, prohibiting fines unless a driver exceeded the speed limit by 6 miles per hour or more in school zones and 10 miles per hour or more elsewhere and requiring governments to conduct extensive safety studies prior to use of cameras. In 2017, this was found to violate home rule. Long story short, the use of these cameras is legal – for now.
No matter where you stand on this issue, you have a right to be informed of law enforcement’s use of these cameras – including where they are. To see the location of every traffic enforcement camera in Toledo, Ohio, please see a map prepared by the Toledo, Ohio traffic attorneys at Sawan & Sawan.
Dennis E. Sawan
Licensed in Ohio and Florida
Dennis P. Sawan
Licensed in Ohio and Georgia
Christopher A. Sawan
Licensed in Ohio and Michigan
Contact an Attorney today to discuss your case.
Request A Call
discover our latest Articles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4dB_d6h83g Chances are, you’ve heard the term whiplash before – but you may not understand how debilitating it is until you’ve suffered from it yourself.
Sarimento et al. v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company, 106 Ohio St.3d 403 (2005) Facts: Appellants (six individuals, including two minors) were driving in New Mexico
Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio et al. v. Swanson et al.58 Ohio St. 3d 189 (1991) Facts: Two groups of teenage children were swimming in
Sawan & Sawan named Top Truck Accident Lawyers by Expertise.com Sawan & Sawan has been named among the top truck accident lawyers in Toledo, Ohio
Failing to Disclose Information in an Insurance Application can Void Coverage In the case of Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co v. Pusser, the importance of
Timely Appeals of Insurance Denials in Ohio Under Curry v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. In the case of Curry v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.,
Personal Injury Lawyers
Ohio Personal Injury Lawyers
Toledo Ohio Personal Injury Lawyers
Columbus Ohio Personal Injury Lawyers
Cleveland Ohio Personal Injury Lawyers
Savannah Georgia Personal Injury Lawyers
Florida Personal Injury Lawyers
Jacksonville Florida Personal Injury Lawyers
Michigan Personal Injury Lawyers